17 Comments

It’s obvious that Starmer and his band of orcs see the farmers as the Bolsheviks saw the Kulaks. For a global communist like Starmer, the farmers must be eliminated. Their ultimate aim is two-fold - to bring food production under centralised control and to wipe out what little is left of the old rural way of life. Once food production is centrally managed they can switch the food on and off at will. No more farmers’ markets, no more independently sourcing produce.

We saw how they could ration food during Covid - food was tightly restricted here in Victoria, Australia. The system built in the limits - at the tills in supermarkets here, you were unable to process anything above the state permitted quantities. Computer Says No. That apparatus was never put away, just put on hold.

Secondly, the farmers and the countryside is the last vestige of Britain to still hold some wealth. The vampires have sucked the lifeblood out of everything else now - private schools, small business, the dead, the list is endless. It’s only the countryside that has anything left for them to pillage. Once that’s gone, God help everyone. They’ll probably tarmac it all and hand it over to SERCO to manage. They’re good at outsourcing evil. The left have always hated the countryside, it’s in their DNA to despise tradition. I’m praying for the farmers. This is good versus evil now, it’s that simple - it’s been that simple for a long time.

Expand full comment

I agree that it is simply this dark.

With the control of money under CBDC'S and food under State/Corporate ownership, it will be comply with the regimes narratives or starve.

I fear most whites will go along with it like COVID. But what happens when Islam has the numbers to overthrow the state?

Expand full comment

Good question! The whole regime is very fragile but, for now, it’s still standing. Here in Australia, we have Digital ID beginning in December. The Australian government are also currently pushing legislation through Parliament here to ban teenagers from social media. Hence the Digital ID, plus facial recognition technology, to police the age of internet users. Everyone will be required to upload their Digital ID for the system to work. Many here are saying they won’t comply, but this may be a harder one to swerve than the vax (I didn’t comply with that one, I managed, not easy). This will be far. far harder. Every system access point will require the ID.

As ever, Australia is the matrix of technocracy. Be sure, if it’s coming to us it will soon follow in Britain and elsewhere.

Expand full comment

Using starvation as a control mechanism (eg the Holodomor or that child-abusing Mormon cunt from youtube) is only the most obvious danger. With centralized food supply, they could significantly ramp up the use of hormones/chemicals/toxins to poison the population and keep them sick, dull-witted and compliant.

And yes, the bucolic parts of Britain are in many ways symbolic of all the positive tradition the Darkness wants to engulf and destroy.

As for Islam, once they gain a majority, or even a significant plurality, I don't see much in the way of them carving out emirates and sultanates from a failing EU. After all, opposition would be Islamophobic.

Expand full comment

Absolutely horrendous Lady

Expand full comment

"There is a sense that a vast set of pincers is gradually closing around the fabric of life in Britain without any clear explanation of what exactly is happening."

A great way to sum up life in a lot of the West.

Expand full comment

There's the real possibility that migration will stop solely because the average quality of life will drop to at par or worse than their home countries.

Expand full comment

True. Parasites are only attracted to successful systems.

Expand full comment
Nov 13Liked by Morgoth

As you say, the world turns.

I was hoping DEI would so blunt competence that Agenda 2030 would be impossible to implement; it relying heavily on difficult engineering and organisational skills of one kind or another. But it would appear the woke was and is being put away, regardless of Trump.

I wonder whether the regime zeitgeist realised that DEI was scuppering Agenda 2030? Despite the regime not being capable of 4D chess, I’m inclined to believe that at an atavistic level it did. And so now no longer ramming absurdities down our throats the pincers close less obviously and perhaps more effectively.

Parenthetically, Clarkson is right to point to “suits”; investment bankers and lawyers. These types are always ahead of the curve and worth keeping an eye as bell weathers for regime direction.

Secondly, AI is less of a worry. It is nowhere near as omnipotent as the hype suggests. Hedgies and banks in my circles are exiting before the rest of the world wakes up to that fact.

Expand full comment
Nov 13Liked by Morgoth

"Thus, growth and de-growth occur simultaneously." AKA cancer.

Even if the Regime is beset by challengers (Populism, BRICS, etc), their schemes are proceeding apace. At this point, the people of the West have little reason to participate in a society that is bent on their depossession and destruction. Do what you have to do, and I'm not advocating anything illegal, but there's no reason to be a productive, law-abiding taxpayer under anarcho-tyranny. To use Game Theory (applied by another article I read), it's like working/middle-class Westerners are cooperating while their governments are defecting, which is a raw deal. Of course, the defector will call you a "traitor" for defecting in return, because they want you to be the sucker and fall guy; that's the situation we're currently in. Emigrating to other parts of the civilized world, or living off of benefits and exploiting the system in return, are both viable options.

Expand full comment

It is impossible not to blackpill, can see this in my small town already. Went for a walk on Sunday, and my formerly quiet route of the Summer was stuffed full of loud, recently arrived urbanites, bimbling around, from their hastliy erected new build estates, in long, ankle length rustling plastic duvets.

Housing targets go up every day, while empty luxury flats in the cities launder the money into the country to keep destroying it.

Expand full comment

Addendum, very difficult to resist further comment without descent into fedpoasting.

A slow, tear rolls down my check as I struggle to accept that 2 +2 has always equalled 5.

Expand full comment

I see this as an attack on native people and a traditional way of life. Rural areas are largely free from the diversity and rainbow nonsense that is front and centre of urban life. The escape to the countryside is being blocked off. The warnings were already sent with "the countryside is racist" propaganda.

I don't want to be pessimistic or black , but I am sceptical about Clarkson. I don't put any weight on him being some sort of revolutionary, despite his near the bone and accurate comments. Obviously, I could be wrong, but I reckon the tory boy bravado and arrogance that has been ever present in his TV career is reflective of his real persona, consequently he will only care about his back pocket. Reality and previous form tells me never trust a tory.

Expand full comment

Nothing sums up how anti-human the current agenda is in Britain (and most of the Western World) more than the war on farmers.

Any honest government in a country that is not fully self-sufficient when it comes to food would be actively encouraging people into the industry, not trying to wipe it out.

When you factor in everything else you mention I can only conclude that the Great Reset is still very much alive, and has simply been rebranded.

Expand full comment

To understand why farmers have become targets, we need to revisit a few historical episodes. Every revolutionary regime that sought to impose centralised control, be it Stalin’s Soviet Union, Mao’s China, or the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia first turned its sights on the rural farmers. Why? Because these regimes understood that to control the people, you must first control the food supply.

Independent farmers, with their patch of land and their livestock, represent a bastion of autonomy. They are self-sufficient in a way that makes them difficult to subjugate. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, the kulaks, those relatively prosperous peasants were branded as enemies of the people. They were blamed for hoarding grain and sabotaging the socialist dream. What followed was a brutal campaign of forced collectivisation, leading to widespread famine, especially in Ukraine, where the Holodomor resulted in the deaths of millions.

Fast forward to the present day, and the methods have evolved, but the underlying logic remains the same. While today's bureaucrats in Brussels and Westminster don’t wield the iron fist of Stalin, they have other tools at their disposal: taxes, subsidies, and regulations so intricate that they function as a noose around the farmer’s neck. extract from my recent article

https://thecounterrevolution.substack.com/p/why-the-elites-hate-farmers-a-tale?r=ry9e1

Expand full comment

Just read this after listening to Delingpole’s latest podcast on the UN’s replacement immigration policy (https://delingpole.podbean.com/e/simon-elmer-1731395633/) and boy are the black pills getting hard to swallow these days.

Expand full comment
11 hrs agoLiked by Morgoth

Things have certainly changed since 2020. For a start, we have someone (in Elon Musk) with a global audience calling out all of this Government’s worst excesses and (in Nigel Farage) a somewhat dissident MP who has the ear of President Trump. It is obvious that Starmer is nervous about the implications of the Trump Presidency but takes comfort from the fact that there remain globalist zealots in charge of the rest of the West. But for how much longer will this continue? How much longer before they begin kissing the ring? Or getting arrested and imprisoned? God knows that these people are guilty of crimes against humanity and Putin wants to get his hands on many of them. I think that things are going to change and change quickly, in ways we can’t even imagine right now.

Expand full comment